Renewable Energy Technologies
Cogeneration Technologies
Biofuel Industries
Solar Energy Systems

Trigeneration Technologies

EcoGeneration Solutions LLC. Companies
E-mail: info(@)cogeneration(.)net Tel. (832) 758-0027
Cooler, Cleaner, Greener Power & Energy Solutions

Home | Contact Us | Links

 
 



Net Energy Metering

www.NetEnergyMetering.com

We provide Cooler, Cleaner, Greener Power & Energy Solutions and Renewable Energy Technologies project development services. These projects are Kyoto Protocol compliant and generate clean energy and significantly fewer greenhouse gas emissions. Unlike most companies, we are equipment supplier/vendor neutral. This means we help our clients select the best equipment for their specific application. This approach provides our customers with superior performance, decreased operating expenses and increased return on investment. 

Renewable Energy Technologies provides project development services that generate clean energy and significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and carbon dioxide emissions. Included in this are our turnkey "ecogeneration" products and services which includes renewable energy technologies, waste to energy, waste to watts and waste heat recovery solutions.  Other project development technologies include; Anaerobic Digester, Anaerobic Lagoon, Biogas Recovery, BioMethane, Biomass Gasification, and Landfill Gas To Energy, project development services. 

Products and services provided by Renewable Energy Technologies includes the following power and energy project development services: 

  • Project Engineering Feasibility & Economic Analysis Studies  

  • Engineering, Procurement and Construction

  • Environmental Engineering & Permitting 

  • Project Funding & Financing Options; including Equity Investment, Debt Financing, Lease and Municipal Lease

  • Shared/Guaranteed Savings Program with No Capital Investment from Qualified Clients 

  • Project Commissioning 

  • 3rd Party Ownership and Project Development

  • Long-term Service Agreements

  • Operations & Maintenance 

  • Green Tag (Renewable Energy Credit, Carbon Dioxide Credits, Emission Reduction Credits) Brokerage Services; Application and Permitting

For more information: call us at: 832-758-0027

We are Renewable Energy Technologies specialists and develop clean power and energy projects that will generate a "Renewable Energy Credit," Carbon Dioxide Credits  and Emission Reduction Credits.  Some of our products and services solutions and technologies include; Absorption Chillers, Adsorption Chillers, Automated Demand Response, Biodiesel Refineries, Biofuel Refineries, Biomass Gasification, BioMethane, Canola Biodiesel, Coconut Biodiesel, Cogeneration, Concentrating Solar Power, Demand Response Programs, Demand Side Management, Energy Conservation Measures, Energy Master Planning, Engine Driven Chillers, Geothermal Heatpumps, Groundsource Heatpumps, Solar CHP, Solar Cogeneration, Rapeseed Biodiesel, Solar Electric Heat Pumps, Solar Electric Power Systems, Solar Heating and Cooling, Solar Trigeneration, Soy Biodiesel, Trigeneration, and Watersource Heatpumps.

What is Net Energy Metering?

Net energy metering is a new way of metering, or measuring the amount of "renewable power" that is generated from a customer's onsite power generation from "renewable energy technologies." Increasingly, more and more residential, commercial and industrial customers are installing renewable energy systems powered or fueled from renewable energies such as solar, biodiesel, biomethane, wind, and geothermal.  This is happening at an increasing rate due to a number of factors, including; 

*  Increasingly greater costs of power from electric utilities, whose power plants generate power from non-renewable fossil fuels such as oil, coal, and natural gas.

*  Prices of renewable energy systems are falling as technology improves.

*  Prices for generating clean, "green" power "onsite" are now competitive, and many times, less expensive than buying dirty, "brown" power from the electric utility and the grid.  

*  The Renewable Portfolio Standards for each state require an increasingly greater amount of green power to be generated each year.  The EPA and DOE are discussing that as much as 20% of the nation's electricity be generated from renewable energy resources.

As there may be days when excessive clouds may reduce the amount of solar energy that is generated by a renewable energy system, the customer may still require additional "brown" electricity on those days their solar system may not be able to produce their daily requirements. So, a "net energy meter" is installed on these homes and businesses wherein the meter can travel in both directions. So, on days the solar powered system produces more than the home or business needs, the excess green power flows to the grid for resale by the local electric utility, and the meter "spins backwards."  On days the solar system may not be able to produce enough energy, "brown" power is "purchased" from the local electric utility, and the net energy meter spins in the opposite direction.  At the end of the month, there is either a net export or transfer of green power from the home or business to the grid, or a net import or transfer of brown power from the local electric utility to the home or business. The net energy meter accurately calculates the balance of green power sold to the grid from the homeowner or business or the amount of brown power that is imported or sold from the electric utility to the home owner or business.  

What is Net Zero Energy and What are Net Zero Energy Buildings?

Net Zero Energy Buildings produce as much energy and power as they use. And many times, they produce more power and energy than they use, and in doing so, if connected to the grid with “Net Energy Metering,” the meters reverse and the building or home owner receives one or more credits, which may also include a “Renewable Energy Credit.” Net Zero Energy Homes and Commercial buildings incorporate "net zero energy " power and energy systems such as "solar heating and cooling," solar thermal collectors, solar electric power systems, and solar trigeneration.

The Audubon Center at Debs Park in Los Angeles installs Solar Trigeneration power and energy system, WITHOUT ANY ELECTRIC CONNECTIONS TO THE GRID OR ELECTRIC UTILITY!  Read our Audubon Center press release here.

We provide Solar Power and Energy systems that we refer to as "ecogeneration™" solutions that produce cooler, cleaner, greener power and energy for our customers and our environment. Unlike most companies, we are equipment supplier/vendor neutral. This means we help our clients select the best equipment for their specific application. This approach provides our customers with superior performance, decreased operating expenses and increased return on investment. 


Our company provides turn-key project solutions that include all or part of the following: 

  • Engineering and Economic Feasibility Studies 

  • Project Design, Engineering & Permitting

  • Project Construction

  • Project Funding & Financing Options

  • Shared/Guaranteed Savings program with no capital requirements. 

  • Project Commissioning 

  • Operations & Maintenance 

  • Green Tag/Renewable Energy Credit Application, and Marketing

For more information: call us at: 832-758-0027

Solar Trigeneration is Pollution-Free-Power and Carbon Free Energy Through the Simultaneous Generation of Cooling, Heating and Power.

"Cut the Cord" to Your Electric Company and 
Dis-connect from Expensive Dirty-Power!

GO GREEN WITH OUR COMBINATION 
SOLAR ELECTRIC POWER &
SOLAR HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEM!


THERE IS NO CLEANER, GREENER, CHEAPER
POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEM THAN OURS!

REBATES, INCENTIVES, GREEN TAGS 
AND TAX CREDITS AVAILABLE

   
Our Solar Electric Power Systems Combined with our
Solar Heating and Cooling system will eliminate your electric bills. "Green" Cooling, Heating and Power is Here!
Homes, Schools, Office Buildings, Hospitals, and 
most any other building or facility can now have
Clean, Green, Power and Energy for *free! 

 

Solar Electric Power Systems (PV)

Solar electric power systems transform sunlight into electricity. Sunlight is an abundant resource. Every minute the sun bathes the Earth in as much energy as the world consumes in an entire year.

Solar cells employ special materials called semiconductors that create electricity when exposed to light. Solar electric systems are quiet and easy to use, and they require no fuel other than sunlight. Because they contain no moving parts, they are durable, reliable, and easy to maintain.

How It Works

Solar cells, also known as photovoltaic (PV) cells, do the work of making electricity. Several types of solar electric technology are under development, but four—crystalline silicon (a form of refined beach sand), thin films, concentrators, and thermophotovoltaics—are illustrative of the range of technologies. Solar cells are connected to a variety of other components to make a solar electric power system.

Crystalline Silicon

Crystalline silicon solar cells are used in more than half of all solar electric devices. Like most semiconductor devices, they include a positive layer (on the bottom) and a negative layer (on the top) that create an electrical field inside the cell. When a photon of light strikes a semiconductor, it releases electrons (see animation). The free electrons flow through the solar cell's bottom layer to a connecting wire as direct current (DC) electricity.

Some solar cells are made from polycrystalline silicon, which consists of several small silicon crystals. Polycrystalline silicon solar cells are cheaper to produce but somewhat less efficient than single-crystal silicon.

A simple silicon solar cell can power a watch or calculator. However, it produces only a tiny amount of electricity. Connected together, solar cells form modules that can generate substantial amounts of power. Modules are the building blocks of solar electric systems, which can produce enough power for a house, a rural medical clinic, or an entire village. Large arrays of solar electric modules can power satellites or provide electricity for utilities.

Solar Electric Power System Components

In addition to modules, several components are needed to complete a solar electric power system.

Many systems include batteries, battery chargers, a backup generator, and a controller so that people in solar-powered homes and buildings can turn on the lights at night or run televisions or appliances on cloudy days. Grid-connected systems don't require batteries or backup generators because they use the grid for backup power. Some remote system applications, such as those used to pump water, do not require a backup power source.

Diagram showing how solar modules can be connected to a DC-AC inverter, battery bank, and a backup generator to provide a continuous source of power in stand-alone applications.

Components of a typical standalone PV system using crystalline silicon technology. (Source: Solar Electric Power Association)

Solar electric power systems can incorporate inverters or power control units to transform the DC electricity produced by the solar cells into alternating current (AC) to run AC appliances or sell to a utility grid. Complete systems usually include safety disconnects, fuses, and a grounding circuit as well.

Thin Films

Solar electric thin films are lighter, more resilient, and easier to manufacture than crystalline silicon modules. The best-developed thin-film technology uses amorphous silicon, in which the atoms are not arranged in any particular order as they would be in a crystal. An amorphous silicon film only one micron thick can absorb 90% of the usable solar energy falling on it. Other thin-film materials include cadmium telluride and copper indium diselenide. Substantial cost savings are possible with this technology because thin films require relatively little semiconductor materials.

Thin films are produced as large, complete modules, not as individual cells that must be mounted in frames and wired together. They are manufactured by applying extremely thin layers of semiconductor material to a low-cost backing such as glass or plastic. Electrical contacts, antireflective coatings, and protective layers are also applied directly to the backing material. Thin films conform to the shape of the backing, a feature that allows them to be used in such innovative products as flexible solar electric roofing shingles.

Concentrators

Concentrators use optical lenses (similar to plastic magnifying glasses) or mirrors to concentrate the sunlight that falls on a solar cell. With a concentrator to magnify the light intensity, the solar cell produces more electricity. Today, most solar cells in concentrators are made from crystalline silicon. However, materials such as gallium arsenide and gallium indium phosphide are more efficient than silicon in solar electric concentrators and will likely see more use in the future. These materials are now used in communications satellites and other space applications.

Concentrators produce more electricity using less of the expensive semiconductor material than other solar electric systems. A basic concentrator unit consists of a lens to focus the light, a solar cell assembly, a housing element, a secondary concentrator to reflect off-center light rays onto the cell, a mechanism to dissipate excess heat, and various contacts and adhesives. The basic unit can be combined into modules of varying sizes and shapes. Concentrators only work with direct sunlight and operate most effectively in sunny, dry climates. They must be used with tracking systems to keep them pointed toward the sun.

Thermophotovoltaics

Thermophotovoltaic (TPV) devices convert heat into electricity in much the same way that other PV devices convert light into electricity. The difference is that TPV technology uses semiconductors "tuned" to the longer-wavelength, invisible infrared radiation emitted by warm objects. This technology is cleaner, quieter, and simpler than conventional power generation using steam turbines and generators.

TPV converters are relatively maintenance-free because they contain no moving parts. In addition to using solar energy, they can convert heat from any high-temperature heat source, including combustion of a fuel such as natural gas or propane, into electricity. TPV converters produce virtually no carbon monoxide and few emissions. They may be used in the future in gas furnaces that generate their own electricity for self-ignition (during power outages) and in portable generators and battery chargers.

Advantages

Solar electric systems offer many advantages. Standalone systems can eliminate the need to build expensive new power lines to remote locations. For rural and remote applications, solar electricity can cost less than any other means of producing electricity. Solar electric systems can also connect to existing power lines to boost electricity output during times of high demand such as on hot, sunny days when air conditioners are on.

Solar electric systems are flexible. Solar electric modules can stand on the ground or be mounted on rooftops. They can also be built into glass skylights and walls. They can be made to look like roof shingles and can even come equipped with devices to turn their DC output into the same AC utilities deliver to wall sockets. These advances mean individual homeowners and businesses can relieve pressure on local utilities struggling to meet the increasing demand for electricity.

More than 30 states offer grid-connected solar electric system owners the chance to save money on their energy bills by feeding any excess power their solar electric system produces into the utility grid—an arrangement called net metering.

Solar power systems require minimal maintenance. They run quietly and efficiently without polluting. They are easy to combine with other types of electric generators such as wind, hydro, or natural gas turbines. They can charge batteries to make solar electricity continuously available.

For utilities, large-scale solar electric power plants can help meet demand for new power generation, especially in distributed applications. A solar electric power plant is created from multiple arrays that are interconnected electronically. Solar electric plants are easier to site and are quicker to build than conventional power plants. They are also easy to expand incrementally—by adding more modules—as power demand increases.

Solar electric power systems are good for the environment. When solar electric technologies displace fossil fuels for pumping water, lighting homes, or running appliances, they reduce the greenhouse gases and pollutants emitted into the atmosphere. The use of solar electric systems is particularly important in developing nations because it can help avert the expected increases in emissions of greenhouse gases caused by the growing demand for electricity in those countries.

Solar electric technologies also benefit the U.S. economy by creating jobs in U.S. companies. Exporting solar electric technologies to developing nations expands U.S. markets while protecting the global environment.

Disadvantages

Although solar electric systems make financial sense in remote areas that lack access to power lines, they are usually more expensive than fossil fuels for grid-connected applications.

This disadvantage is significant for utilities considering large-scale solar electric power plants. Although solar electricity costs considerably more than electricity generated by conventional plants, regulatory agencies often require utilities to supply electricity for the lowest cash cost.

Utilities view solar electric power plants differently than they view conventional power plants. Solar electric modules produce electricity intermittently—only when the sun shines. Their output varies with the weather and disappears altogether at night. Integrating solar electricity into a utility system requires creative planning.

Applications

Aerial photo showing solar electric arrays and solar hot-water systems installed on the roof of the Georgia Tech University Aquatic Center.

A combination of solar electric arrays and pool-heating solar collectors were used to provide power and heat to the Georgia Tech University Aquatic Center, site of the 1996 Olympic swimming competition. (Credit: Heliocol)

Solar electricity has powered satellites since the dawn of the space program. It has run remote communications outposts high in the mountains and turned on the lights, kept medicines cold, and pumped water in rural areas for more than 30 years. Small solar cells are used to power wristwatches, calculators, and other electronic gadgets. More recently, solar electric systems have been used to provide supplemental power to homes and commercial buildings in cities.

Solar electric technology has important roles to play in both the developing and developed worlds. From the farmer irrigating his crops in rural Mexico to an innovative lighting system for an Olympic sports arena, solar electric solutions abound.

Electric utilities harness solar electricity for distributed applications—near substations or at the end of overloaded power lines, for example, to avoid or defer costly line upgrades. They use solar electricity during hot, sunny periods when the demand for air conditioning stretches conventional power generation to its limit. The Sacramento Municipal Utility District, for example, uses large solar electric arrays as part of its power generation mix. Utilities also rely on solar electricity to power remote, standalone monitoring systems.

Consumers and builders are integrating solar electric modules into their homes and offices. Innovative solar electric technologies can replace conventional roofing and facade materials in new buildings. Solar electric roofing shingles, for example, are being used in some new residences. In grid-connected applications, solar electricity supplies some of a consumer's energy needs; the local utility provides the rest.

Standalone solar electric systems power a variety of applications far from the reaches of the power grid. These applications include remote communications systems such as television and radio transmitters and receivers, telephone systems, and microwave repeaters. Standalone solar electric power is also used to prevent corrosion of metal pipes, tanks, bridges, and buildings.

Many remote residences worldwide use solar electricity as their source of power. For instance, more than 100,000 vacation homes in Scandinavia rely solely on solar electric technology to run lights and appliances.

Villages around the world are building solar electric systems to bring electricity to their homes and local industries, often for the first time. To make the maximum use of available resources, village power is typically produced by a hybrid power system that combines solar electricity with diesel backup generators and sometimes another renewable energy technology such wind power. Villages also use standalone solar electric systems for pumping water—an application shared by rural farmers and ranchers in the United States.

For more information, visit the following Web sites:

Our Solar Heating and Cooling System - Uses the "free" Power of the Sun to Heat and Cool your Commercial Business or Home for Free!

Cooling and heating your building (home, office, school, hospital, etc.) costs you up to 60%, or more, every month you receive your electric bill. You can eliminate the heating and cooling portion of your electric bill forever, and cool and heat your home with the sun's power with our Solar Heating and Cooling system!   

Our Solar Heating and Cooling system is the cleanest, greenest, and lowest cost method to cool and warm your home or commercial office or other buildings.  Our Solar Heating and Cooling system will eliminate your energy costs for heating and cooling your home, office, school, or any other commercial facility for *free: Requires the purchase of our Solar Heating and Cooling system. Minimum size is 10 tons. You must be located in a qualified geographic location, which means our system must be located to receive direct sunlight.  For qualified customers, we will install the system with little to no money down and you pay for the system with the savings our system provides! 

Solar Absorption Cooling. Solar heat can be used to displace electricity used for cooling. Absorption chillers use a heat source, such as natural gas or hot water from solar collectors, to evaporate the already-pressurized refrigerant from an absorbent/refrigerant mixture. Condensation of vapors provides the same cooling effect as that provided by mechanical cooling systems. Although absorption chillers require electricity for pumping the refrigerant, the amount is very small compared to that consumed by a compressor in a conventional electric air conditioner or refrigerator. Solar Absorption Cooling systems are typically sized to carry the full air conditioning load during sunny periods. 

Let Us Help You Design, Install and Buy Your Combination
Solar Electric Power and Heating & Cooling System System

Call us at 832-758-0027

or e-mail us at:  sales@cogeneration.net for more information

We provide Demand Side Management design and project development solutions that may provide a return on investment in less than 12 months.  We also offer energy-saving technologies that may include; Absorption Chillers, Adsorption Chillers, Automated Demand Response, Cogeneration, Demand Response Programs, Demand Side Management, Energy Master Planning, Engine Driven Chillers, Trigeneration and Energy Conservation Measures.  

Our company provides turn-key project solutions that include all or part of the following: 

  • Engineering and Economic Feasibility Studies 

  • Project Design, Engineering & Permitting

  • Project Construction

  • Project Funding & Financing Options

  • Shared/Guaranteed Savings program with no capital requirements. 

  • Project Commissioning 

  • Operations & Maintenance 

For more information: call us at: 281-955-7343 or 832-758-0027

U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Energy Security and the State Energy Program

By Maurice Kaya,
Chairman, State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB)

Photo of transmission lines

The nation's centralized system of production and distribution of electricity is potentially more vulnerable to disruptions than would be a decentralized system.
Photo credit: Warren Gretz, NREL

Energy security is as critical today as it was when the first state energy offices (SEOs) opened their doors in the 1970s. In those days, the United States was dependent on overseas suppliers for less than 40 percent of the country's oil needs, and a key objective of the Nixon Administration's "Project Independence" was to reduce that level of reliance. Since then, as former Energy Secretary Bill Richardson said in 1999, "Oil has literally made foreign and security policy for decades."

Today we are dependent on foreign countries for 60 percent of our petroleum needs1. Although the oil import trend has been decidedly in the wrong direction, the good news is that now we are poised to benefit from almost 30 years of research and development in energy efficiency, renewable fuels, and renewable energy technologies (RETs).

Points of Vulnerability

Unlike distributed resources, our modern energy infrastructure requires large central-station power plants and extensive distribution systems, both of which are susceptible to acts of terrorism or natural disaster. Anyone who doubts the vulnerability of our national electricity grid need only recall a hot summer night several years ago, when an untrimmed tree limb succumbed to winds and dropped on a line in Oregon. In a cascading series of events, the lights went out west of the Mississippi River.

Liquid fuels flow through pipelines that also experience periodic disruptions. Imports come to us on tankers passing through shipping lanes that are potentially as vulnerable as that power line in Oregon. And it is difficult and costly to protect all terminuses and refineries from any eventuality. Furthermore, the cost of overseas supplies is subject to the influence of nationalist regimes and the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).

The Price of Dependency

Petroleum is our number one fuel, and our consumption of it continues to grow at a rate faster than all other primary energy sources2. Today the U.S. consumes more than a quarter of the world's oil—more than the next five oil-consuming countries combined3. In 2000, our imports cost U.S. consumers $109 billion4, an amount equal to 25% of our country's balance-of-trade deficit for the year5.

In part because oil producing countries in the Organization of Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD) are pumping their reserves faster than the OPEC countries, OPEC is expected to control an even greater portion of the world's oil in 20 years than it does today6. In addition, the demand for petroleum will continue to increase in the late-developing countries as their domestic economies grow. The combined forces of increased demand and finite supply can be expected to maintain upward pressure on price.

 

World Crude Oil Production - OPEC 42%, OECD 25%, Russia 9%, China 4%, Rest of the world 20%.  26 billion barrels per year. World Energy Outlook 2001, International Energy Agency.

OECD countries in Europe and North America are producing their reserves faster than OPEC.

World Crude Oil Reserves - OPEC 63%, OECD 8%, Russia 14%, China 3%,  Rest of the world 12%.  960 billion barrels. World Energy Outlook 2001, International Energy Agency.

As a result, an increasing percentage of what's left lies in OPEC's hands.

 

Graph of world oil prices from 1970 to 2000; 1970 - $2 per barrel; 1980 - $34 per barrel; 1990 - $20 per barrel; 2000 - $25 per barrel. Source: DOE's Energy Information Administration

Over the last three decades, the world has experienced seesaw swings in the price of oil.
Source: World Oil Market and Price Chronologies DOE Energy Information Administration; originally published by the Department of Energy's Office of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, Analysis Division

Strategic geo-political alliances will continue to be made, based on the need for the resource of the "oil have-nots" and on the need for foreign currency in the "oil haves." Countries on the "wrong" side of these alliances might experience reduced oil supplies or dramatically increased prices. In the last 30 years, each of three oil price shocks in the U.S. was precipitated by a political crisis in the Middle East. Moreover, after each shock, the U.S. suffered an economic recession.

While no credible experts argue that it is possible to go "off" imported oil in the near- or mid-term, energy efficiency, RETs, and domestically produced renewable fuels can reduce the extent of our dependence on foreign countries for the energy lifeline of our economy.

A Proven Performer

Unlike 30 years ago when the Nixon Administration first tried to wean our country off foreign oil following the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973, the assumed one-to-one relationship between energy inputs and economic outputs no longer exists. This is due to energy efficiency—the U.S. economy is almost 40 percent more energy efficient than it was in 1970. Put another way, one could say that the U.S. today obtains 40 percent of its "energy services" from energy efficiency compared with thirty years ago4.

Graph of energy use as a function of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product. 1970 - $1, 1980 - $.82, 1990 - $.70, 2000 - $.60.

While our Gross Domestic Product increased from $1 trillion in 1970 to $10.3 trillion in 2000, the energy intensity of our economy decreased by 40%. Before 1970, energy use had increased hand in hand with growth in the economy.
Source: Annual Energy Review 2000; DOE Energy Information Administration.

Graph of U.S. petroleum consumption (measured in million barrels per day) from 1950 to 2000 by sector: transportation (1950 - 1.5, 1960 - 3.2, 1970 - 3.9, 1980 - 5.9, 1990 - 7.5, 2000 - 8.5), industry (1950 - .8, 1960 - .7, 1970 - 1.8, 1980 - 2.8, 1990 - 3, 2000 - 3.7), commercial (1950 - .6, 1960 - 1, 1970 - 1.4, 1980 - .3, 1990 - .8, 2000 - .8), and electric power(1950 - .2, 1960 - .2, 1970 - .9, 1980 - .9, 1990 - .7, 2000 - .5).

More than two-thirds of U.S. oil consumption is in the transportation sector, where energy demand grows at full throttle.
Source: Annual Energy Review 2000; DOE Energy Information Administration

Moreover, it takes energy to make and deliver energy to the point of use. Twenty years ago, the Texas energy office estimated the amount of energy actually saved through efficiency and conservation. It derived the following equation:

1 barrel of oil saved = 1.4 barrels "earned"7

Efficiency, by its nature, reduces the need for conventional energy—whether liquid fuels in the transportation sector, fuels for electricity and space conditioning in the buildings sector, or process fuels in the industrial sector.

Because 67 percent of U.S. petroleum is consumed in its vehicles and most imported oil is delivered to refineries that produce motor fuels, many state energy programs target the transportation sector. Some aim to directly reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT). For example, the Washington Energy Office created the Commute Trip Reduction program in 1991. Today, some 18,500 vehicle trips are eliminated statewide every day because of this program. This translates into 207,000 fewer VMT and 12.8 fewer tons of air pollution per year. In 1999, this program saved more than $8 million in avoided fuel purchases for Washington residents8.

Other state programs make traffic flow more efficiently. For example, many states have adjusted timing of traffic lights through computerized control so that cars do not hit every red light on a thoroughfare and do not idle more than necessary. They have also installed low-energy traffic signals and adopted other promising techniques. The efficiency equation is very simple: reducing VMT and making traffic flow more efficiently reduces imports of foreign oil.

Finally, SEOs sponsor public education campaigns and set examples with their own fleets of vehicles. Through such programs, SEOs have been key to market acceptance of fuel-efficient cars and trucks, alternative fuel vehicles, and renewable fuels.

Renewable Fuels and Resilient, Distributed Energy

Both renewable fuels and distributed energy power generation rely on local energy resources that have implications for our energy security. Renewable fuels can be produced domestically from biomass—material from plants and crops—potentially providing new markets for rural producers. Most important, utilizing renewable fuels directly reduces our dependence on overseas oil suppliers.

For example, corn ethanol can be produced on America's farms for $25–$30 per barrel9 and is mixed with gasoline in varying proportions. Nationwide, ethanol is catching on, due partly to state energy programs. And DOE research to produce ethanol from agriculture and forestry residues is bearing fruit in the construction of this country's first biomass-to-ethanol plant in Louisiana. Meanwhile, Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Nebraska, and Wisconsin are among the most active states promoting domestically produced ethanol.

In Iowa, for example, ethanol production and consumption adds more than $1.7 billion to the state economy10. The ethanol industry accounts for 2,550 jobs in the state and affects an additional 10,000 jobs. Altogether, Iowans consumed 57 million gallons of ethanol for transportation fuel in 1997, displacing 790,000 barrels of imported oil in that state alone.

Distributed applications of renewable energy in buildings, off-grid, and in mini-grids also contributes to our nation's security. This is because distributed generation offsets the need for an equivalent amount of central-station power generation and the related wires to distribute it. Electricity, heating, or cooling is produced close to where it is used, which leads to greater environmental benefits since these systems tend to be more efficient and can reduce transmission and distribution system losses. Sprinkling generation from renewable resources throughout the fragile power distribution system strengthens it through decentralization.

States are leading efforts to create public and private partnerships to accelerate the use of advanced technologies such as the hydrogen fuel cell. Notable examples include the California Fuel Cell Partnership and an emerging partnership being developed by the Hawaii Energy Office. Hawaii's abundant renewable energy resources and unique energy environment are leading to greater use of hydrogen from renewable energy sources.

State Energy Solutions

Today, the network of state energy offices has become an important element of our national energy scene. SEO programs match energy innovations to local conditions and economies. The SEOs are naturally suited to crafting, testing, and demonstrating solutions to today's energy security challenges.

Long before the terrorist attacks of September 11, state energy offices have developed formal plans to respond to an energy emergency. Under DOE's State Energy Program (SEP) and predecessor programs, states have had energy emergency plans in place for more than a decade. In 1998, DOE's Atlanta Regional Office published model guidelines for incorporating energy efficiency and renewable energy in state energy emergency plans. (Staff from DOE headquarters and from the Alliance to Save Energy also played a role in developing this document.) Today SEP plays a critical role in helping states with their energy programs.

Part of making it work is coordinating state and national policies on energy security, according to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB). In its 2001 Annual Report, STEAB upholds the critical role of the states in carrying out national energy priorities. Now more than ever, these priorities must include energy efficiency and renewable energy.

Notes:
1 Annual Energy Review 2000; DOE Energy Information Administration; DOE/EIA 0384; October 2001.
2 World Energy Outlook 2001; International Energy Agency; OECD/IEA; October 2001.
3 International Energy Annual 1998; Tables 1.2 and 8.1; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Energy Information Administration.
4 Mobilizing Energy Solutions, Amory Lovins and L. Hunter Lovins; The American Prospect; Vol. 13, Issue 2; January 28, 2002.
5 United States Country Analysis Brief, U.S. Energy Information Administration; 20 pp; October 2001.
6 Annual Energy Outlook 2002; DOE Energy Information Administration.
7 Report to the Governor, the Legislature, and the Citizens of Texas, State of Texas Energy Policy Partnership; Austin, Texas, March 1993.
8 Commute Trip Reduction: Is it Worth the Investment?, Washington State Department of Transportation, Draft Report, May 2001.
9 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy: The "No Regrets" Path to America's Energy Future; State Energy Advisory Board; 35 pp., August 2001. 10 Ibid.

Reducing Dependence on Imported Oil

EIA's Persian Gulf Oil and Gas Exports Fact Sheet

DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) publishes this in-depth fact sheet about the oil exports and reserves of the countries in the Persian Gulf. These countries—Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates—contain more than half of the world's petroleum reserves and a third of its natural gas reserves. Western Europe (OECD member nations) and Japan are much more dependent on Persian Gulf oil than is the United States. Oil-exporting countries in the Persian Gulf are exported to participate in a greater share of world oil markets over the next two decades than they do today.

California workshop to reduce dependence on imported oil.

The California Energy Commission publishes a series of documents outlining how the state can reduce consumption of foreign-produced oil, including:

  • Impacts of Telecommuting on Vehicle Miles Traveled: A nationwide Time Series Analysis (PDF 762 KB) Download Acrobat Reader.
    The California Energy Commission (CEC) publishes this report written by a CEC consultant that attempts to quantify the benefits, albeit modest, of existing and potential near-term government programs promoting telecommuting; 84 pp., January 2002.

  • Projected Automotive Fuel Cell Use in California
    The California Energy Commission is one of the most active organizations in the country pursuing the adoption of fuel cells for transportation in the state; 28 pp.; October 2001.

Reducing Dependence on Foreign Oil

Light Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends 1975 through 2001—Executive Summary (PDF 36 KB) Download Acrobat Reader.
Since the majority of petroleum is consumed in the transportation sector, the fuel efficiency of cars and trucks has a large influence on oil imports. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) follows the efficiency trends of U.S. passenger cars and light trucks for the past 26 years; 9 pp.; September 2001.

For information on individual models, see DOE's 2002 Fuel Economy Guide.

Hybrid Electric Vehicles
DOE explains why the 2002 automobile models with the highest fuel economies are hybrid electric vehicles. This Web site also delves into other advances in automobile technology that can substantially increase fuel efficiencies of motor vehicles.

Graph of the average fuel economy of U.S. cars and trucks (measured in miles per gallon) from 1975 to 2000.  Cars: 1975 - 13.5, 1985 - 23, 1995 - 24.  Trucks: 1975 - 11.5, 1985 - 17.5, 1995 - 17.  Both cars and trucks: 1975 - 13, 1985 - 21.5, 1995 - 21.

The fuel economy of U.S. cars and light trucks has decreased in the past 20 years.

Biofuels and Energy Security
In the long run, transportation fuels from renewable resources can supplant the requirements of importing oil from overseas. DOE's Office of Transportation Technologies (OTT) publishes this summary of how biofuels can contribute directly to U.S. energy security. OTT addresses issues of oil supply disruptions and estimates the cost of military operations to guarantee uninterrupted flow of oil from the Gulf Region.

State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB) Releases Report to DOE

In Mid-October, the State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB) consisting of state energy officials issued a report to DOE citing the "compelling advantages of energy efficiency and renewable energy in meeting our nation's energy needs... especially in light of our current and potential conflicts in the oil-rich Middle East and Persian Gulf regions." STEAB publishes the entire report online, titled Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy - A No-Regrets Path to America's Energy Future. (PDF 4.8 MB) Download Acrobat Reader., 35 pp; August 2001.

Security and Reliability of the U.S. Electricity Supply

Graph showing schematic representation of U.S. electric power control system divided into five control regions of the American Electric Reliability Council (NERC).

The security of the North American power grid is intimately tied to the issue of reliability, an issue that received constant scrutiny by power companies and the North American Electricity Reliability Council (NERC). Source:North American Electricity Reliability Council; December 2001. (larger version)

DOE Energy Assurance Conference
The National Association of State Energy Officials (NASEO) publishes highlights from a recent DOE-sponsored conference on security for critical energy infrastructures. The conference was held in Arlington, Virginia on December 12-13, 2001, and was attended by a number of high-level officials from state governments and the electricity, oil, gas, and transportation industries. Included in this NASEO summary are the presentations of several speakers in view-graph format.

Dimensions of Reliability - Electric System Reliability for Elected Officials
This highly readable, yet thorough report summarizes the complicated business of keeping the U.S. electricity system one of the most reliable of any in the world. Although most of us take it for granted, this system is truly one of the engineering feats of modern society. The report is published by the National Council on Competition and the Electric Industry as part of the Electric Industry Restructuring Series with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency. The report was written by Richard Sedano of the Regulatory Assistance Project in Montpelier, Vermont; 60 pp; October 2001.

Least-Cost Paths to Reliability - 10 Questions for Policymakers

In a related publication, the Regulatory Assistance Project's Issueletter addresses the question of reliability of the electricity system from a cost perspective. This short newsletter article written for utility regulators and energy policy makers takes you through the cost calculation of the traditional method for increasing the reliability of the electric system for a typical electric utility, namely, purchasing a combustion turbine to be used as a peaking unit; 6 pp; June 1999.

State Energy Emergency Plans

NASEO Recommendations to Enhance Energy Security and Improve Federal and State Energy Emergency Mitigation and Response Capabilities
The National Association of State Energy Officials (NASEO) published this short series of recommendations to improve the nation's preparedness to respond to energy emergencies. These recommendations build upon existing capabilities in the states and stress cooperation among federal and state agencies; 4 pp.; April 2000.

Model Guidelines for Incorporating Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy into State Emergency Plans (PDF 158 KB) Download Acrobat Reader.

DOE's State Energy Program (SEP), the Atlanta Regional Office, and the Alliance to Save Energy publishes these model guidelines for state energy offices; 12. pp; September 1999.

Energy Emergency Information Coordinators

NASEO also publishes the name and phone number of the primary contact in each state in the event of an emergency. This procedure has been in place for more than a decade, and its importance was underscored by the terrorist attacks of September 11; 2 pp.; revised February 2002.

California's Energy Emergency Contingency Plan
The California Energy Commission is in the verification phase of preparing its energy emergency plan and has published a number of supporting documents online.

Iowa Energy Emergency Plan
The Iowa Department of Natural Resources - Energy Bureau prepared this report on how the state can respond to a shortage of one of its primary fuels or electricity; 52 pp.; revised January 2002.


How Does an Absorption Chiller Work?

Absorption chillers use heat instead of mechanical energy to provide cooling. A thermal compressor consists of an absorber, a generator, a pump, and a throttling device, and replaces the mechanical vapor compressor.

 

In the chiller, refrigerant vapor from the evaporator is absorbed by a solution mixture in the absorber. This solution is then pumped to the generator. There the refrigerant re-vaporizes using a waste steam heat source. The refrigerant-depleted solution then returns to the absorber via a throttling device. The two most common refrigerant/ absorbent mixtures used in absorption chillers are water/lithium bromide and ammonia/water.

 

Compared with mechanical chillers, absorption chillers have a low coefficient of performance (COP = chiller load/heat input). However, absorption chillers can substantially reduce operating costs because they are powered by low-grade waste heat. Vapor compression chillers, by contrast, must be motor- or engine-driven.

 

Low-pressure, steam-driven absorption chillers are available in capacities ranging from 100 to 1,500 tons. Absorption chillers come in two commercially available designs: single-effect and double-effect. Single-effect machines provide a thermal COP of 0.7 and require about 18 pounds of 15-pound-per-square-inch-gauge (psig) steam per ton-hour of cooling. Double-effect machines are about 40% more efficient, but require a higher grade of thermal input, using about 10 pounds of 100- to 150-psig steam per ton-hour.

 

A single-effect absorption machine means all condensing heat cools and condenses in the condenser. From there it is released to the cooling water. A double-effect machine adopts a higher heat efficiency of condensation and divides the generator into a high-temperature and a low-temperature generator.


Is It Right for You?

Absorption cooling may be worth considering if your site requires cooling, and if at least one of the following applies:

  • You have a combined heat and power CHP) unit and cannot use all of the available heat, or if you are considering a new CHP plant

  • Waste heat is available

  • A low-cost source of fuels is available

  • Your boiler efficiency is low due to a poor load factor

  • Your site has an electrical load limit that will be expensive to upgrade

  • Your site needs more cooling, but has an electrical load limitation that is expensive to overcome, and you have an adequate supply of heat.

In short, absorption cooling may fit when a source of free or low-cost heat is available, or if objections exist to using conventional refrigeration. Essentially, the low-cost heat source displaces higher-cost electricity in a conventional chiller.

 

In Practice


In a plant where low-pressure steam is currently being vented to the atmosphere, a mechanical chiller with a COP of 4.0 is used 4,000 hours a year to produce an average 300 tons of refrigeration. The plant's cost of electricity is $0.05 a kilowatt-hour. 

An absorption unit requiring 5,400 lbs/hr of 15-psig steam could replace the mechanical chiller, providing annual electrical cost savings of:

Annual Savings = 300 tons x (12,000 Btu/ton / 4.0) x 4,000 hrs/yr x $0.05/kWh x kWh/3,413 Btu = $52,740


Actions You Can Take

Determine the cost-effectiveness of displacing a portion of your cooling load with a waste steam absorption chiller by taking the following steps:

  • Conduct a plant survey to identify sources and availability of waste steam

  • Determine cooling load requirements and the cost of meeting those requirements with existing mechanical chillers or new installations

  • Obtain installed cost quotes for a waste steam absorption chiller

  • Conduct a life cycle cost analysis to determine if the waste steam absorption chiller meets your company's cost-effectiveness criteria.

Absorption Chiller Refrigeration Cycle

The basic cooling cycle is the same for the absorption and electric chillers. Both systems use a low-temperature liquid refrigerant that absorbs heat from the water to be cooled and converts to a vapor phase (in the evaporator section). The refrigerant vapors are then compressed to a higher pressure (by a compressor or a generator), converted back into a liquid by rejecting heat to the external surroundings (in the condenser section), and then expanded to a low- pressure mixture of liquid and vapor (in the expander section) that goes back to the evaporator section and the cycle is repeated.

The basic difference between the electric chillers and absorption chillers is that an electric chiller uses an electric motor for operating a compressor used for raising the pressure of refrigerant vapors and an absorption chiller uses heat for compressing refrigerant vapors to a high-pressure. The rejected heat from the power-generation equipment (e.g. turbines, microturbines, and engines) may be used with an absorption chiller to provide the cooling in a CHP system.

The basic absorption cycle employs two fluids, the absorbate or refrigerant, and the absorbent. The most commonly fluids are water as the refrigerant and lithium bromide as the absorbent. These fluids are separated and recombined in the absorption cycle. In the absorption cycle the low-pressure refrigerant vapor is absorbed into the absorbent releasing a large amount of heat. The liquid refrigerant/absorbent solution is pumped to a high-operating pressure generator using significantly less electricity than that for compressing the refrigerant for an electric chiller. Heat is added at the high-pressure generator from a gas burner, steam, hot water or hot gases. The added heat causes the refrigerant to desorb from the absorbent and vaporize. The vapors flow to a condenser, where heat is rejected and condense to a high-pressure liquid. The liquid is then throttled though an expansion valve to the lower pressure in the evaporator where it evaporates by absorbing heat and provides useful cooling. The remaining liquid absorbent, in the generator passes through a valve, where its pressure is reduced, and then is recombined with the low-pressure refrigerant vapors returning from the evaporator so the cycle can be repeated.

Absorption chillers are used to generate cold water (44°F) that is circulated to air handlers in the distribution system for air conditioning.

"Indirect-fired" absorption chillers use steam, hot water or hot gases steam from a boiler, turbine or engine generator, or fuel cell as their primary power input. Theses chillers can be well suited for integration into a CHP system for buildings by utilizing the rejected heat from the electric generation process, thereby providing high operating efficiencies through use of otherwise wasted energy.

"Direct-fired" systems contain natural gas burners; rejected heat from these chillers can be used to regenerate desiccant dehumidifiers or provide hot water.

Commercially absorption chillers can be single-effect or multiple-effect. The above schematic refers to a single-effect absorption chiller. Multiple-effect absorption chillers are more efficient and discussed below.

Multiple-Effect Absorption Chillers

In a single-effect absorption chiller, the heat released during the chemical process of absorbing refrigerant vapor into the liquid stream, rich in absorbent, is rejected to the environment. In a multiple-effect absorption chiller, some of this energy is used as the driving force to generate more refrigerant vapor. The more vapor generated per unit of heat or fuel input, the greater the cooling capacity and the higher the overall operating efficiency.

A double-effect chiller uses two generators paired with a single condenser, absorber, and evaporator. It requires a higher temperature heat input to operate and therefore they are limited in the type of electrical generation equipment they can be paired with when used in a CHP System.

Triple-effect chillers can achieve even higher efficiencies than the double-effect chillers. These chillers require still higher elevated operating temperatures that can limit choices in materials and refrigerant/absorbent pairs. Triple-effect chillers are under development by manufacturers working in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy.

* Geothermal Energy... Power from the Depths

The Earth's crust is a bountiful source of energy—and fossil fuels are only part of the story. Heat or thermal energy is by far the more abundant resource. To put it in perspective, the thermal energy in the uppermost six miles of the Earth's crust amounts to 50,000 times the energy of all oil and gas resources in the world!

The word "geothermal" literally means "Earth" plus "heat." The geothermal resource is the world's largest energy resource and has been used by people for centuries. In addition, it is environmentally friendly. It is a renewable resource and can be used in ways that respect rather than upset our planet's delicate environmental balance.

Geothermal power plants operating around the world are proof that the Earth's thermal energy is readily converted to electricity in geologically active areas. Many communities, commercial enterprises, universities, and public facilities in the western United States are heated directly with the water from underground reservoirs. For the homeowner or building owner anywhere in the United States, the emergence of geothermal heat pumps brings the benefits of geothermal energy to everyone's doorstep.

The Basics

There's a relatively simple concept underlying all the ways geothermal energy is used: The flow of thermal energy is available from beneath the surface of the Earth and especially from subterranean reservoirs of hot water. Over the years, technologies have evolved that allow us to take advantage of this heat.

In fact, electric power plants driven by geothermal energy provide over 44 billion kilowatt hours of electricity worldwide per year, and world capacity is growing at approximately 9% per year. To produce electric power from geothermal resources, underground reservoirs of steam or hot water are tapped by wells and the steam rotates turbines that generate electricity. Typically, water is then returned to the ground to recharge the reservoir and complete the renewable energy cycle.

Underground reservoirs are also tapped for "direct-use" applications. In these instances, hot water is channeled to greenhouses, spas, fish farms, and homes to fill space heating and hot water needs.

Geothermal energy use extends beyond underground reservoirs. The soil and near-surface rocks, from 5 to 50 feet deep, have a nearly constant temperature from geothermal heating. As a homeowner or business owner, you can use the Earth as a heat source or heat sink with geothermal heat pumps. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), geothermal heat pumps are one of the nation's most efficient—and therefore least polluting—heating, cooling, and water-heating systems available. In winter, these systems draw on "earth heat" to warm the house, and in summer they transfer heat from the house to the earth, which ranges in temperature from 50° to 70°F (10° to 21°C) depending on latitude.

A Clear Advantage

Geothermal energy delivers some powerful environmental and economic benefits. If you live in an area that uses geothermal resources for electricity production, you're quite fortunate. Consider Lake County, California, which is home to many of the geothermal power plants at our nation's best-developed geothermal resource, The Geysers. It's no coincidence that the Lake County air basin is the first and only one in compliance with all of California's stringent air quality regulations.

Perhaps you own a greenhouse and need to cut exorbitant energy bills in order to stay in business. If you are located near a geothermal resource, you should know that most greenhouse growers estimate that direct use of geothermal resources instead of traditional energy sources reduces heating costs by up to 80%. This can save about 5% to 8% in total operating cost.

Assume you're a home or business owner who has installed a geothermal heat pump. You're not only doing your part to help make the world a cleaner place to live and breathe, you're rewarded with low operating and maintenance costs, and, usually, lowest life-cycle costs. (Life-cycle cost is the total cost of the equipment spread over the useful life of the equipment.) In practical terms, your heat pump investment may cost you $15 per month more in mortgage payments, but it may save you $30 per month on your electric bill.

In all three of these cases, domestic, not foreign, resources are being used—a practice that has merits all its own. Nearly half of our nation's annual trade deficit would be obliterated if we could displace imported oil with domestic energy resources. A nation's trade deficit represents a permanent loss of wealth for the citizens of that nation. Keeping the wealth at home translates to more jobs and a robust economy. And not only does our national economic and employment picture improve, but a vital measure of national security is gained when we control our own energy supplies.

Types of Geothermal Resources

The center of the Earth is 4000 miles (6400 kilometers) deep. How hot is this region? Our best guess is 7200°F (4000°C) or higher. Partially molten rock, at temperatures between 1200° and 2200°F (650° to 1200°C), is believed to exist at depths of 50 to 60 miles (80 to 100 kilometers).

Heat is constantly flowing from the Earth's interior to the surface. Most types of geothermal resources—hydrothermal, geopressured, hot dry rock, and magma—result from concentration of Earth's thermal energy within certain discrete regions of the subsurface.

Hydrothermal resources are reservoirs of steam or hot water, which are formed by water seeping into the earth and collecting in, and being heated by fractured or porous hot rock. These reservoirs are tapped by drilling wells to deliver hot water to the surface for generation of electricity or direct use. Hot water resources exist in abundance around the world. In the United States, the hottest (and currently most valuable) resources are located in the western states, and Alaska and Hawaii. Technologies to tap hydrothermal resources are proven commercial processes.

Geopressured resources are deeply buried waters at moderate temperature that contain dissolved methane. While technologies are available to tap geopressured resources, they are not currently economically competitive. In the United States, this resource base is located in the Gulf coast regions of Texas and Louisiana.

Hot dry rock resources occur at depths of 5 to 10 miles (8 to 16 kilometers) everywhere beneath the Earth's surface, and at shallower depths in certain areas. Access to these resources involves injecting cold water down one well, circulating it through hot fractured rock, and drawing off the now hot water from another well. This promising technology has been proven feasible, but no commercial applications are in use at this time.

Magma (or molten rock) resources offer extremely high-temperature geothermal opportunities, but existing technology does not allow recovery of heat from these resources.

Earth energy is the heat contained in soil and rocks at shallow depths. This resource is tapped by geothermal heat pumps.

Geothermal Power Plants—from Water to Light

Flip a switch and light up a room—what could be easier? Push a button on the TV remote control and be entertained. It all seems so simple that we are often unaware of the true environmental and social cost of these conveniences—and who would want to give them up even if we had to account for every penny?

But rather than thinking in terms of giving things up, let's think positively: in the United States, right now, the installed generating capacity for geothermal stands at about 2700 megawatts. That's the equivalent of about 58 million barrels of oil, and provides enough electricity for 3.7 million people. The cost of producing this power ranges from 4¢ to 8¢ per kilowatt hour. The geothermal industry is working to achieve a geothermal life-cycle energy cost of 3¢ per kilowatt hour. And remember, this is clean energy produced from domestic resources.

How clean? In terms of air emissions, geothermal power plants have an inherent advantage over fossil fuel plants because no combustion takes place. Geothermal plants emit no nitrogen oxides and very low amounts of sulfur dioxide—allowing them to easily meet the most stringent clean air standards. The steam at some steam plants contains hydrogen sulfide, but treatment processes remove more than 99.9% of those emissions. Typical emissions of hydrogen sulfide from geothermal plants are less than 1 part per billion—well below what people can smell. The low levels of air emissions produced are mostly carbon dioxide, which many people believe acts as a greenhouse gas to trap heat within Earth's atmosphere. Even so, geothermal plants emit minimal amounts of carbon dioxide—1/1000 to 1/2000 of the amount produced by fossil-fuel plants.

Geothermal water sometimes contains salts and dissolved minerals. In the United States, the geothermal water is usually injected back into the reservoir from where it came, at a depth well below groundwater aquifers, after its heat energy has been extracted. This recycles the geothermal water and replenishes the reservoir. However, some geothermal plants also produce some solid materials, or sludges, that require disposal in approved sites.

All U.S. geothermal power plants are located in the states of California, Nevada, Utah, and Hawaii—home to some of the most majestic scenery on Earth. It's fortunate, then, that these plants consume only a small amount of land, and can coexist with numerous other land uses, including agriculture, with minimal impact on the surrounding beauty.

They're reliable and efficient, too. Taken as a group, geothermal power plants are available to generate power 95% or more of the time; they are seldom off-line for maintenance or repair. And, they have the highest capacity factors of all types of power plants. Capacity factor is the ratio of the amount of electricity a plant produces to how much electricity it is capable of producing.